End of the Road for Infringing Photographs, Appeal Court Rules
ENDOFTHEROADFORINFRINGINGPHOTOGRAPHS,APPEALCOURT
RULES
LAURENTCARRIÈREANDCLAIRECÉBRON*
LEGERROBICRICHARD,
LLP
L
AWYERS,ANDPATENTANDTRADE-MARKAGENTS
PRECIS:AnappealcourtconfirmedapermanentinjunctionorderingRTITurboto
removeasetofphotographsfromitswebsite.ThecourtfoundthatRTI,whichhad
arguedthattherespondenthadnorightsinthephotographs,hadconfusedtwo
distinctiverights:thecopyrightsinaphotographandtherightsinthephotographed
objects.
InRTITurboIncvCanadaAlliedDieselCompanyLtd(2007QCA1420;2007-10-
15)theQuébecCourtofAppealhasaffirmedatrialjudge’sdecision(2005CANLII
39802;2005-10-25)toissueapermanentinjunctionorderingtheappellantsto
removecontentiousphotographsfromtheirwebsiteandtostopusingthemin
violationoftherespondent’scopyright.Theappellantsclaimedthattherespondent
hadnorightsinthephotographsandthattheywerenotartisticworksandtherefore
notprotectedbytheCopyrightAct.
CanadaAlliedDieselCompanyLtd(CAD)specializesinthefabrication,
reconstructionandrepairofdieselandlocomotiveengines.Italsodistributesengine
componentsandoffersvariousassociatedservices.RTITurboIncremanufactures
dieselandlocomotiveengines.OgunfoworaToyinandRonnieWallacewere
employedbyCADuntilDecember2000.Theythencreatedtheirownbusiness(RTI)
wheretheyappliedtheexpertisetheyhadacquiredwhileworkingforCAD.
CADaskedthetrialjudgeforaninjunctionto:
·prohibittheappellantsfromusingitstrademark;
·prohibittheappellantsfromusingphotographsownedbyCAD;and
©CIPS,2007.*Lawyerandtrade-markagent,LaurentCarrière,isaseniorpartnerwithLEGERROBICRICHARD,
L.L.P.,
amultidisciplinaryfirmoflawyers,andpatentandtrademarkagents.ClaireCébronisan
articlingstudentwiththefirm.Publishedinthe2007-12-10issueofWorldCopyrightLawReport.
Publication328.040.
2
·ordertheremovalofthesephotographsfromRTI’swebsite.
CADsubmittedthattheappellantsactedinviolationoftheCopyrightActandthe
Trade-marksAct.CADfurtheraskedthattheappellantsbeorderedtopayC$25,000
indamagesaswellasthecosts.
Beforethetrialjudge,theappellants:
·arguedthatCADdidnotownthephotographs;
·deniedtheuseofCAD’Strademark;
·calledupontheirrighttofreecompetition;and
·assertedthatCAD’Sactionwasabusiveandvexatious.
ToyinandWallacebothclaimedC$50,000incompensatorydamagesandRTI
claimedC$50,000incompensatoryandpunitivedamages.
Afterreviewingthephotographsonthewebsiteandhearingthevarioustestimonies,
thetrialjudgecametotheconclusion,inaccordancewithSections2,3and13of
theCopyrightAct,thatCADdidowncopyrightinthephotographs,whichhadbeen
takenbyCADemployeesandpublishedonCAD’swebsite.Bypublishingthe
photographsontheirwebsitewithoutCAD’sconsent,theappellantshadviolated
CAD’scopyrightinthephotographs.Moreover,Toyin,whowasresponsibleforthe
website’sdevelopment,andWallace,ashareholderinandadministratorofRTI,
shouldhaveknownthatpublishingthesephotographsviolatedCAD’scopyright.The
courtissuedapermanentinjunctionorderingRTI,ToyinandWallacetowithdrawthe
photographsfromRTI’swebsiteandtoceasealluseofanyphotographbelongingto
CAD.ThecourtfinedtheappellantsC$5,000incosts,withinterestandadditional
compensation.ThecourtalsograntedCADC$10,000indamages,withinterestand
additionalcompensation.ThecourtfoundnounauthorizeduseofCAD’strademark.
RTI,ToyinandWallaceappealedthedecision.TheCourtofAppealrejectedthe
appealwithcostsforthefollowingreasons:
First,thecourtfoundthattheappellantsconfusedtwodistinctiverights:the
copyrightsinaphotographandtherightsinthephotographedobjects.Justices
Pelletier,BichandCôténotedthatinordertoholdacopyrightinaphotographunder
theCopyrightAct,itisnotnecessarytohaverightsintheobjectsportrayedinthe
photograph.
Second,thecourtanalyzedthequestionofqualificationforcopyrightandthe
conceptof‘originalworks’.ThecourtstatesthatwithregardtotheCopyrightAct,
creativityisnotnecessaryforaworktoberecognizedasoriginal.AstheSupreme
3
CourtofCanadadecidedinCCHCanadianLtdvLawSocietyofUpperCanada
(1004SCC13)autilitarianworkmaybenefitfromtheact’sprotectionaslongasthe
workisoriginal.Anoriginalworkresultsfromtheauthor’stalentandjudgement.
Accordingtothecourtafactualanalysisisnecessarytodetermineifaworkis
originalandprotectedbytheCopyrightAct.AsestablishedinBetaplexincvB&A
ConstructionLtée(2006QCCA886;2006-06-27),suchananalysisisamixed
questionoffactsandlaw.
Theissueattrialwasnotwhetherthecontentiousphotographswerecopiesor
reproductionsofprotectedworks.Allthetrialjudgehadtodecidewasifthe
photographsofusefulobjectsresultedfromtheauthor’stalentandjudgement.In
respecttotheapplicablejudicialnorm,JusticeLangloisfoundthattheywereoriginal
works.Fortheappealtobegranted,theappellants,whoquestionedthetrialjudge’s
perceptionoftheoriginalityofthephotographs,neededtoestablishthatthetrial
judgehadmadeamanifestanddeterminingerror.
Thecourtfoundthatthetrialjudgerightfullyexercisedherdiscretionarypower
regardingtheextrajudiciaryfees,asprovidedspecificallyintheCopyrightAct.The
courtdecidednottopronounceitselfonthequestionofdamagesandadditional
compensationastheappellantsdidnotcontesttheamountofdamages.
4
ROBIC,ungrouped’avocatsetd’agentsdebrevetsetdemarquesdecommercevoué
depuis1892àlaprotectionetàlavalorisationdelapropriétéintellectuelledanstousles
domaines:brevets,dessinsindustrielsetmodèlesutilitaires;marquesdecommerce,marques
decertificationetappellationsd’origine;droitsd’auteur,propriétélittéraireetartistique,
droitsvoisinsetdel’artisteinterprète;informatique,logicielsetcircuitsintégrés;
biotechnologies,pharmaceutiquesetobtentionsvégétales;secretsdecommerce,know-
howetconcurrence;licences,franchisesettransfertsdetechnologies;commerce
électronique,distributionetdroitdesaffaires;marquage,publicitéetétiquetage;poursuite,
litigeetarbitrage;vérificationdiligenteetaudit;etce,tantauCanadaqu’ailleursdansle
monde.
ROBIC,agroupoflawyersandofpatentandtrademarkagentsdedicatedsince1892tothe
protectionandthevalorizationofallfieldsofintellectualproperty:patents,industrialdesigns
andutilitypatents;trademarks,certificationmarksandindicationsoforigin;copyrightand
entertainmentlaw,artistsandperformers,neighbouringrights;computer,softwareand
integratedcircuits;biotechnologies,pharmaceuticalsandplantbreeders;tradesecrets,
know-how,competitionandanti-trust;licensing,franchisingandtechnologytransfers;e-
commerce,distributionandbusinesslaw;marketing,publicityandlabelling;prosecution
litigationandarbitration;duediligence;inCanadaandthroughouttheworld.
COPYRIGHTER
IDEASLIVEHERE
ILATOUTDEMÊMEFALLUL’INVENTER!
LAMAÎTRISEDESINTANGIBLES
LEGERROBICRICHARD
NOSFENÊTRESGRANDESOUVERTESSURLEMONDEDESAFFAIRES
PATENTER
R
ROBIC
ROBIC+DROIT+AFFAIRES+SCIENCES+ARTS
ROBIC++++
ROBIC+LAW+BUSINESS+SCIENCE+ART
THETRADEMARKERGROUP
TRADEMARKER
VOSIDÉESÀLAPORTÉEDUMONDE,DESAFFAIRESÀLAGRANDEURDELAPLANÈTE
YOURBUSINESSISTHEWORLDOFIDEAS;OURBUSINESSBRINGSYOURIDEASTOTHEWORLD